If you’ve ever done any mulitcam editing using mulitcam tools in any of the NLEs you’ll immediately recognize the layout: it looks a lot like a 9-split mulitcam screen where the viewer is divided into nine quadrants, one for each camera angle. Just a quick glance at the device and you’ll see the middle of the product is dedicated to mulitcam editing with nine CAM (Camera) buttons waiting to be pressed. That begs the question: Is Resolve’s Cut page/Speed Editor integration better for multicam editing? That was certainly one of the featured aspects of the Speed Editor during the product introduction. Even a novice editor can pickup mulitcam editing with relative ease. But if you have sync timecode the complexity of traditional mulitcam clip creation is mostly eliminated as it’s a one-click operation to create a multicam clip in the Edit page. The proper operation of these things works best when your multicam shoot has sync timecode. We have both the Cut page Sync Bin and a third of the entire Speed Editor surface editor dedicated entirely to multicam editing. One of the things that I think the Speed Editor is intended to eliminate is the seeming complexity of the creation of multicam clips and multicam editing overall. One look at the Speed Editor and you can see that mulitcam editing was at the top of the list when it was designed. Who made who? I don’t know but they go hand in hand. While you can have mulitcam editing in the Cut Page without the Speed Editor you sure can’t edit mulitcam with the Speed Editor without the Cut page. I don’t think you can really talk at length about the Speed Editor, and especially mulitcam editing, without including the Cut Page in that discussion. This second part is all about multicam and multicamera editing with the Speed Editor and the Cut Page. In Part 1, I covered the hardware, trimming, a lot of the Cut page and basic editing with the Speed Editor. This is Part 2 of my DaVinci Resolve Speed Editor review.
0 kommentar(er)
